World Heritage nominations

World Heritage status is one of the highest international recognition on the planet. As such, every site inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List is carefully selected following a rigorous process.

IUCN evaluates all natural and mixed sites aspiring to achieve World Heritage status and makes recommendations to the World Heritage Committee.

The evaluation of nominations is a year-long process involving IUCN's network of field experts. To ensure the credibility of the World Heritage List, it assesses the global significance, management, and integrity of the nominated sites.

It combines field missions, desk reviews, and voluntary input from experts with knowledge of the sites or the natural values they represent.

nomination process

A country signs the World Heritage Convention
                            ↓
The country compiles an inventory of potential sites, known as a Tentative List
                            ↓
The country prepares nomination files for candidate sites
                            ↓
IUCN evaluates natural and mixed candidate sites
                            ↓
IUCN advises the World Heritage Committee whether to inscribe or not inscribe a site, defer a decision, or refer a nomination back to the country
                            ↓
IUCN's recommendations are published six weeks before the annual World Heritage Committee meeting
                            ↓
The World Heritage Committee takes the final decision

Proposed nominations for 2016

  • Canada, Pimachiowin Aki, mixed site
  • Canada, Mistaken Point
  • Chad, Massif de l’Ennedi : paysage naturel et culturel: mixed site
  • China, Hubei Shennongjia
  • France, Ensemble tectono-volcanique de la Chaîne des Puys et faille de Limagne (referred in 2014)
  • India, Khangchendzonga National Park: mixed site
  • Iran, Lut Desert
  • Iraq, The Ahwar of Southern Iraq: refuge of biodiversity and the relict landscape of the Mesopotamian Cities: mixed site
  • Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Western Tien-Shan
  • Mexico, Archipiélago de Revillagigedo
  • Russian Federation, Western Caucasus (Significant boundary modification)
  • Russian Federation, Virgin Komi Forests (Significant boundary modification)
  • Sudan, Sanganeb Marine National Park and Dungonab Bay/Mukkawar Island Marine National Park (referred in 2015)
  • Thailand, Kaeng Krachan Forest Complex (referred in 2015)
  • Turkmenistan, Mountain Ecosystems of Koytendag
  • United Kingdom, Giant’s Causeway and Causeway Coast (minor boundary modification)
  • Viet Nam, Trang An Landscape Complex, mixed site (minor boundary modification)

Useful publications
  • Cover page: Terrestrial gaps study
  • Cover of IUCN Marine Gaps Study
Lists of nominations evaluated by IUCN
Contact

If you wish to provide comments on upcoming nominations, contact christelle.perruchoud@iucn.org