Recommendation
04
Building Comprehensive and Effective
Protected Area Systems
Economic, cultural, intrinsic, aesthetic and spiritual values of biological
diversity are experienced by all people. At the same time the increasing
rate of loss of biological diversity will seriously undermine the quality
of life of future human generations unless this issue is addressed as
a matter of urgency.
Ongoing and extremely rapid human-induced changes, such as habitat loss
and spread of alien invasive species, continue to erode biodiversity,
and species ranges are shifting due to climate change.
New analyses presented at this Congress have shown that the global PA
network is far from finished, with significant gaps in the coverage of
Protected Area systems for threatened species, globally important sites,
habitats and realms.
These gaps and changes require the expansion of existing, and the strategic
creation of new, protected areas while ensuring the connectivity of suitable
habitat between them.
A reduction in the rate of loss of biological diversity can be achieved
through protected area systems in all ecoregions of the world that are
comprehensive, ecologically and biologically viable, representative,
and effectively managed. Threatened species, particularly those listed
in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, must be effectively conserved
in these networks of protected areas.
The target to achieve “a significant reduction in the current
rate of loss of biological diversity” by the year 2010, agreed
by the 6th Conference of the Parties of the Convention on Biological
Diversity (Decision VI/26), restated in the Hague Ministerial Declaration
of April 2002, and endorsed by the world’s leaders at the World
Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in September 2002 remains valid.
The WSSD Plan of Implementation
states that biological diversity plays “a
critical role” in “overall sustainable development and poverty
eradication” and that “biodiversity is currently being lost
at unprecedented rates due to human activities”. Protected area
systems should ensure that valuable ecosystem services are sustained.
Biodiversity is not evenly distributed across the globe, thus an effective
network of protected areas to reduce the rate of loss of biological diversity
should be based on an adequate understanding of the patterns of distribution
of species, habitats, ecosystems and ecological processes across all
scales. Systematic conservation plans and decision-support tools should
be used to identify targets for protection based on such understanding.
The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) is a vital tool to measure
the efforts of governments and civil society to build comprehensive protected
area networks. This database is maintained by the UNEP-World Conservation
Monitoring Centre with the support and assistance of the WDPA Consortium
that includes members of international conservation NGOs and other interested
agencies. The importance of the database has been reflected in the UNEP
Governing Council decision of 2003, implemented through a MOU signed
between IUCN and UNEP at WPC 2003 and supported by the WDPA Consortium.
Many Multilateral Environmental Agreements, notably the Convention on
Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory
Species of Wild Animals, Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, the Convention for the Protection of
the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, and the Convention on Wetlands
of International Importance, along with many regional agreements, recognise
the importance of protecting biodiversity as a priority for all nations.
With these points in mind, participants in the workshop on Building
Comprehensive Protected Area Systems concluded that nations need to consider
biodiversity-based targets as a means of maximising the coverage and
representation of biological diversity and, in particular, threatened
components of biological diversity in their protected area systems.
In addition to the conventional system of protected areas based on IUCN
designated categories, a range of opportunities exist for enhancing coverage
of protected areas, including community conservation areas, community
managed areas, and private and indigenous reserves.
For protected areas to meet their biodiversity conservation and economic
development objectives, they must receive adequate financial support.
However, it is noted that many countries with the highest levels of biodiversity
are challenged by inadequate financial means and by the imperative of
poverty alleviation. Many countries therefore compromise on creating
and/or effectively managing a comprehensive and effective protected area
system even when it is not in the national or global interest.
Therefore, PARTICIPANTS in the workshop stream on Building Comprehensive
Protected Area Systems at the Vth World Parks Congress, in Durban, South
Africa (8-17 September 2003):
1. URGE governments, non-government organizations and local communities
to maximise representation and persistence of biodiversity in comprehensive
protected area networks in all ecoregions by 2012, focusing especially
on threatened and under-protected ecosystems and those species that qualify
as globally threatened with extinction under the IUCN criteria. This
will require that:
a. Systematic conservation planning tools that use information on species,
habitats and ecological processes to identify gaps in the existing system
be applied to assist in the selection of new protected areas at the national
level;
b. All globally threatened species are effectively conserved in situ
with the following immediate targets:
i. all Critically Endangered and Endangered species globally confined
to single sites are effectively conserved in situ by 2006;
ii. all other globally Critically Endangered and Endangered species
are effectively conserved in situ by 2008;
iii. all other globally threatened species are effectively conserved
in situ by 2010; and
iv. sites that support internationally important populations of congregatory
and/or restricted-range species are adequately conserved by 2010;
c. Viable representations of every terrestrial, freshwater and marine
ecosystem are effectively conserved within protected areas, with the
following immediate targets:
i. A common global framework for classifying and assessing the status
of ecosystems established by 2006;
ii. quantitative targets for each ecosystem type identified by 2008;
and
iii. viable representations of every threatened or under-protected ecosystem
conserved by 2010;
d. Changes in biodiversity and key ecological processes affecting biodiversity
in and around protected areas are identified and managed;
e. Regional landscape and seascape planning should consider locally
generated maps, and incorporate zoning and management planning processes
to assist in designing and enhancing comprehensive protected area networks
that conserve wide-ranging and migratory species and sustain ecosystem
services;
f. Protected area systems are established by 2006 that adequately cover
all large intact ecosystems that hold globally significant assemblages
of species and/or provide ecosystem services and processes;
g. Increase the coverage of
protected areas in freshwater ecosystems as proposed by the Convention
on Biological Diversity Recommendation
VIII/2 to establish and maintain a “comprehensive, adequate and
representative system of protected inland water ecosystems… using
integrated catchment/watershed/river basin management” by 2012;
and
h. Create a representative network of marine protected areas by 2012,
as stated in the WSSD Plan of Implementation;
2. URGE the Parties to the CBD to make the achievement of the above-mentioned
targets possible by adopting a strong program of work and consider legal
mechanisms on protected areas at COP7 that ensures the establishment
of a representative global network of protected areas. In support of
the Program of work, establish an effective mechanism to measure progress
towards the achievement of the above-mentioned targets and ensure the
provision of adequate financing to support such a network, in accordance
with Article 20 and Article 8(m) of the CBD;
3. CALL on governments, local authorities, donors and development assistance
agencies, the private sector, and other stakeholders to financially support
the strategic expansion of the global network of protected areas as well
as the effective management of existing protected areas. Whilst taking
appropriate steps to defray the attendant human opportunity costs where
appropriate;
4. URGE governments to use international instruments, such as the Convention
for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage and the
Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, to enhance the protection
given to sites, and pass domestic legislation to implement their convention
obligations, with a view to achieving the targets outlined above;
5. CALL on governments to develop and implement innovative plans and
legislation involving all stakeholders to conserve biodiversity and ecological
processes effectively under various conditions of land and resource ownership
and usage rights, as well as across national boundaries;
6. URGE governments, non-government organizations, donors, private sector
and development assistance agencies to promote socio-economic and cultural
benefits of protected areas to foster support for the expansion of protected
area networks;
7. REQUEST the consortium of institutions responsible for maintaining
and managing the World Database on Protected Areas to continue the process
of enhancing the quality of the data, and making these publicly available
and accessible;
8. URGE the Parties to the CBD to request all governments to provide
annual updates of information to the WDPA;
9. URGE the private sector to adopt best practices that do not threaten,
compromise or thwart the achievement of the aforementioned targets and
to assist in the establishment of a comprehensive ecologically and biologically
viable and representative network of protected areas;
10. REQUEST the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas to establish
a task force on conservation planning to guide countries in the achievement
of the targets outlined in this recommendation;
11. CALL on parties to the World Heritage Convention to encourage the
nomination of global physiographic, natural and cultural phenomena as
large-scale multi-states serial World Heritage Routes to serve as frameworks
for local and trans-boundary World Heritage sites and protected areas;
and
12. URGE governments, local authorities, private sector, donors and
development assistance agencies to ensure that further work towards building
comprehensive protected areas systems takes full account of the rights,
interest and aspirations of indigenous peoples, as well as of their desire
to have their lands, territories and resources secured and protected
for their own social and cultural survival.
| Stream: Gaps:
Building Comprehensive Protected Area Systems
Stream Lead: Mohamed
Bakarr
|
back
to top // back to recommendations home
|