|
Pigs, Peccaries and
Hippos Status Survey and Action Plan (1993) Chapter 5.2 The Eurasian Wild Pig, Sus
scrofa William L. R. Oliver, I. Lehr Brisbin, Jr. and
Shunjo Takahashi. Status and Action Plan Summary Status categories: all subspecies are 1-3
(widespread and locally abundant to potentially at risk), except riukiuanus which is 4 or 5 (which is
vulnerable or endangered) according to population. The Eurasian wild pig has one of the widest
geographic distributions of all terrestrial mammals, and this range has been
greatly expanded by human agency. The species now occurs in pure wild or
barely modified feral form on all continents excepting Antarctica, and on
many oceanic islands. It is the ancestor of most (but not all) ancient and
modern domestic pig breeds, and there is evidence to suggest that it was
independently domesticated in several different parts of its range, including
S. E. Asia, the Far East and Asia Minor. As a wild form, it has constituted a
primary resource of subsistence hunters since the earliest times, and it is
one of the most important targets for recreational hunting wherever it
remains sufficiently abundant. Over-hunting and changes in land use have
resulted in the fragmentation of its range and its extermination throughout the
British Isles, Scandinavia, parts of North Africa, and relatively extensive
parts of its range in the (former) U.S.S.R. and northern Japan. Nevertheless,
the species remains widely distributed and is often locally abundant. As a
result of its depredations on crops it is regarded as a pest in many
countries, where it remains unprotected outside designated wildlife reserves
or is managed as a game animal. Action plan priorities for this species focus on
threats from habitat loss, over-hunting, disease and genetic contamination to
the smallest and most threatened subspecies, S. s. riukiuanus. The Ryukyu wild pig is the only one of the (c.
16) recognized subspecies to be in included in the IUCN Red List, where it is
presently accorded 'vulnerable' status. However, it is probably already
'endangered' on four (Ishigaki, Iriomote, Tokuno Shima and Okinawa) of the
six islands on which it occurs, as a result of habitat loss, hunting
pressure, hybridization with domestic pigs and introduced diseases. Other
priority recommendations include the need for additional data on the
distribution and status of certain other (less-known) subspecies, including a
tentatively assigned form (subsp. nov.)
from the central highlands of Sri Lanka; the resolution of questions relating
to the genetic distinctness and range limitations of some of the continental
races; and the ecological and genetic relationships between this and other
species of Sus in those areas where
sympatry occurs. Introduction S. scrofa is the antecedent of the
overwhelming majority (but not all) domestic and feral pig populations. In
its native form it has one of the largest ranges of any wild ungulate and,
together with its domestic and feral derivatives, it has one of the most
extensive distributions of all mammals. In different parts of this range it
is naturally sympatric with at least three congenors (S. salvanius, S. barbatus and
S. verrucosus), though it or its
derivatives have been introduced by human agency into areas supporting all
other (formerly allopatric) congenors (S.
celebensis, S. cebifrons and S. philippensis) and non-congenors (Potamochoerus, Hylochoerus, Phacochoerus
and Babyrousa), as well as the New
World Tayassuids (Tayassu and Catagonus). Where introduced
populations have become naturalized and abundant they are generally regarded
as environmental pests (Oliver and Brisbin, this vol.), as well as posing a
threat of disease contagion and/or genetic contamination to native suids,
including endemic populations of this species (see later text). S. scrofa has been studied extensively in
Europe, North Africa and in the (former) U.S.S.R., and much comparable
research has been conducted on the introduced, mostly feral, populations in
the U.S.A., Australia and New Zealand (Briedermann, 1990). Available data
indicate that the basic diploid number of 38 chromosomes (similar to domestic
pigs) is found in eastern and south-east Asian populations, but this number
decreases by Robertsonian translocations over the species' extensive range
such that the continental European populations have only 36 chromosomes
(Bosma et al., 1984). Eurasian wild
pigs are also markedly variable in size, pelage and some other characters,
and an enormous number of subspecies, and several different species, have
been described. However, in a major review of the genus Sus, Groves (1981) argued that many of these named forms were
synonymous or, in some cases were actually naturalized feral or hybrid (with S. celebensis) populations. Groves
accordingly recognized only 16 subspecies, including a previously undescribed
form, S. s. davidi, from Pakistan
and north-western India, though he also drew attention to a small, as yet
unclassifiable, skull from Central Province, Sri Lanka, which may represent
another new subspecies. Only a few of the currently recognized subspecies,
such as the insular taivanus
(Taiwan) and riukiuanus (Ryukyu
Is., south Japan), have clearly defined ranges, and precise data is lacking
on the range limits/intergradation zones of many of the continental forms. Groves
and Grubb (this vol.) have therefore distinguished four 'subspecies
groupings', based on both geographic and morphological criteria, as follows: 1. 'Western races' of Europe (scrofa and meridionalis), North Africa (algira)
and the Middle East (lybicus),
extending at least as far east as Soviet Central Asia (attila and nigripes); 2. 'Indian races' of the Sub-Himalayan region
from Iran in the west (davidi) to
north India and adjacent countries as far east as Burma and west Thailand (cristatus), and south India and Sri
Lanka (affinis and subsp. nov.); 3. 'Eastern races' of Mongolia and the Soviet
Far East (sibiricus and ussuricus, Japan (leucomystax and riukiuanus),
Taiwan (taivanus), to south-east
China and Vietnam (moupinensis);
and 4. 'Indonesian race' (or banded pig) from the
Malay Peninsular, Sumatra, Java, Bali and certain offshore islands (vittatus). Former and Present Distribution S. scrofa is one of the most widely
distributed terrestrial mammals, and has by far the largest range of all
suiformes. It occurs throughout the steppe and broadleaved forest regions of
the Palaearctic, from western Europe to the Soviet Far East, extending
southwards as far North Africa, the Mediterranean Basin and the Middle East,
through India, Indo-China, Japan (including the Ryukyu Chain), Taiwan and the
Greater Sunda Islands of South-east Asia. Populations east of Bali are
probably all introduced. It has been extinct in the British Isles since
sometime in the 17th century, despite attempted introductions of new stock
from Europe (Harting, 1880). It is also extinct in southern Scandinavia, over
extensive portions of its recent range in west-central and eastern parts of
the (former) Soviet Union (Heptner et
al., 1961), and in northern Japan (Chiba, 1964, 1975). The species was
last reported in Libya in the 1880's, and it became extinct in Egypt in about
1902 (Hufnagl, 1972; Fig. 10). Link to Fig. 10:
Approximate former and present distribution of the Eurasian wild pig Sus scrofa ssp. Modified after Heptner
et al., 1961; Groves, 1981). Habitat, Ecology and Behavior The Eurasian wild pig occupies a wide variety of
habitats, from semi-desert to tropical rain forests, temperate woodlands,
grasslands and reed jungles; often venturing onto agricultural land to
forage. The species is omnivorous, though stomach and fecal contents analyses
indicate that vegetable matter, principally fruits, seeds, roots and tubers,
constitutes about 90% of the diet (Spitz, 1986). A field study of the
Indonesian wild pig, S. s. vittatus,
in Ujung Kulon National Park in Java, indicated that these animals are
predominately frugivorous, feeding on about 50 species of fruits, especially
those of strangling figs (Ficus spp.), and that they are important seed
dispersal agents (Pauwels, 1980). By comparison, analyses of the stomach
contents of wild pigs (also S. s.
vittatus) in agricultural areas of West Malaysia by Diong (1973),
revealed that sugar cane, tapioca and rice were the commonest food items, but
that usually more than one type of food had been eaten, even where a single
cultivated crop was abundant. Other items commonly consumed by these pigs
included soil, earthworms, roots and other vegetable matter and, in mangrove
areas, mollusks, crabs and other arthropods and even fishes. The consumption
of invertebrate and small vertebrate prey may be a necessary component of the
diet, since a study of free-ranging domestic pigs in Papua New Guinea
revealed that animals fed ad libitum
lost weight when denied earthworms (Rose & Williams, 1983). In common
with its feral derivatives (Oliver & Brisbin, this vol.), S. scrofa has also occasionally been
reported to predate larger vertebrates, such as deer fawns and (tethered) goats
(Hoogerwerf, 1970), though it is possible that such incidents involve only a
few individuals in the population; an aspect also noted by Pauwels (1980)
when referring to the predation of sea turtle nests by wild pigs in Udjung
Kulon. Similarly, a large boar (S. s.
cristatus) in Royal Chitawan National Park, Nepal, which was seen to
displace an adult leopard from its kill, a domestic buffalo calf, which it
then partly consumed (W. Oliver, pers. obs.), was reported by Park staff to
regularly commandeer such kills, but that no other individual pigs had been
seen to do this. Wild pigs are normally most active in the early
morning and late afternoon, though they become nocturnal in disturbed areas,
where activity usually commences shortly before sunset and continues
throughout the night. A total of 4 to 8 hours are spent foraging or traveling
to feeding areas. Feeding is generally a social activity (even solitary males
may join feeding groups) which also provides an opportunity for display and
other agonistic behaviors (Beuerle, 1975). Radio telemetry studies in
southern France indicate that they generally travel between 2 and 15 km per
night, though this is often within an area of only 20 to 150 ha. However, the
home range estimates for adult females and adult males over a 2-3 month
period varied from 500-1,000 ha and 1,000-2,000 ha, respectively. During this
same period, subadults covered an area of 500- 5,000 ha, and after 6 to 12
months they may have covered more than 10,000 ha; the larger home ranges of these
animals being related to their expulsion from their natal groups and then
undergoing a wandering phase. Movements over long distances (50 to 250 km)
have also been recorded in Europe, but the extent and purpose of these
movements has yet to be studied (Spitz, 1986). Experiments in which tagged
animals are released and subsequently recovered provide evidence that they
disperse freely over even larger areas (500 to 750 km2), which may also
indicate the area occupied by large population units. The density of
free-ranging S. s. scrofa in Europe
rarely exceeds 5 individuals/km2 (Spitz, 1986), though much higher
concentrations have been reported elsewhere, e.g. 27-32/ km2 on Peucang
Island in Ujung Kulon National Park, Java (Pauwels, 1980) and 32.2-72.1/km2
in sugarcane areas in the Punjab, Pakistan (Shafi & Khokhar, 1985). Wild pigs are gregarious, forming herds or
'sounders' of varying size depending on locality and season, but usually of
between 6-20 individuals, though aggregations of over 100 have been reported
(Prater, 1971; Legakul & McNeely, 1977; Briedermann, 1990)). The basic
social unit is a nucleus of one or more females and their last litters.
Animals peripheral to this comprise subadults from previous litters, and
adult males during the mating season. However, the latter tend to stay in
relatively close contact with 1 or 2 female groups at other times of the
year, and subadult males or mixed sex groups of subadults may also form
longer-term associations (Spitz & Janeau, 1990). The dynamics of the basic
group include the isolation of the preparturient female, her re-entry with
young, entry of nulliparous females, the arrival of adult males with the
simultaneous departure of subadult animals (Spitz, 1986). In contrast to its
domestic derivatives, reproductive activity in S. scrofa tends to be seasonal
and positively correlated with the relative availability of principal
foodstuffs or related climatic factors. In tropical countries, such as Sri
Lanka, peak estrus activity has been recorded during the wettest months of
November and December (Santiapillai and Chambers, 1980). However, social
organization may also play a role in modulating the timing of reproductive
events, since farrowing is often synchronized amongst females in the same
social groups, which suggests a mechanism for synchronizing the onset of
estrus (Spitz, 1986). Wide fluctuations in the numbers of animals killed
by hunters, particularly in the (former) U.S.S.R. and in France, suggest
cyclic changes in the numbers of wild pigs available for hunting. Annual
recruitment into the total population depends on reproductive rate (i.e. the
number and prolificacy of females) and juvenile mortality, both of which
factors may be influenced by the availability of foodstuffs and other
external factors (Spitz, 1986). In western Europe, litter size is usually
between 4 and 7 piglets (Briedermann, 199), though Harrison and Bates (1991)
cite reports of 5 and 7-10 piglets per litter as being usual in Iraq and
Armenia, respectively. Pauwels (1980) recorded an average litter size of 6-10
piglets at the beginning of the breeding season in Java, but this number
dropped to only 2-4 piglets per litter towards the end of the breeding
season. In the Ryukyu Islands, S. Japan, there is evidence that the wild pigs
(S. s. riukiuanus) have two
breeding seasons per year, though it remains uncertain whether individual
sows normally produce litters twice a year (Yasuma, 1984). Juvenile mortality
averages 15% in the first three months in western Europe, though between 50%
and 75% mortality have been reported by the end of the first year of life
(Jezierski, 1977; Briedermann, 1990). These mortality rates are thought to be
highly dependant on such external factors as predation and climatic hazards,
at least in wilderness areas (Spitz, 1986). Similarly, Pauwel (1982)
suggested that the principal causes of juvenile mortality in wild pigs in
Ujung Kulon were predation (particularly as a consequence of the accidental
separation of infants from their mothers), along with differences in the
relative rate of development of litter-mates and various parasite-related
causes. These factors resulted in only about 15% of all progeny surviving to
independence. Threats to Survival Habitat destruction and hunting pressure, either for
food, sport or in reprisal for crop damage, are the principal threats to this
species, particularly in areas near human habitation. In Afghanistan,
Hassinger (1970) cited reports of the decrease in the numbers of wild pigs in
the Pul-i-Khumri District in the 1950's as a result of the draining of
marshlands for agricultural purposes and hunting by Europeans; but noted that
they were still numerous in other districts where: "they invade the
fields and cause serious damage during the harvest". In parts of Perak
and Johore in West Malaysia, Diong (1973) reported that the numbers of wild
pigs (S. s. vittatus) had
diminished drastically as a result of increased hunting pressure,
particularly for commercial purposes, and that most hunting methods, whether
with guns, dogs or snares, was entirely non-selective. Nonetheless, wild pigs
are still included in Malaysia's 'Agricultural Pest Ordinance, 1977', on
account of their damage to a variety of crops, including sugar cane, tapioca,
rice and even coconuts. Lay (1967) also remarked upon the damage to crops by
wild pigs in Iran which: "...brings great wrath upon them, usually
ineffectual, from the local farmers". In Pakistan, the expansion of the
sugar cane industry in the 1960's and early 1970's brought about local increases
in the numbers of wild pigs (S. s.
davidi), whose depredations in the cane fields (estimated at an annual
loss rate of Rs.5 million in 1978) led to the development of control
measures, including the use of poison baits (Shafi & Khokhar, 1985). Although actually referring to wild pigs in India,
it is clear that Prater's (1971) opinion that: "No animal is more
destructive to crops and, in cultivated areas, it is impossible to make a
plea for its protection", would find popular support in many other
countries. In the Ryukyu Islands, S. Japan, the endemic S. s. riukiuanus is actively regarded as an environmental pest,
and bounties are paid to farmers for killing them by the Japanese Government,
despite the fact that this taxon is recognized internationally as being
seriously threatened throughout it extremely restricted range (see later
text). In various places in Indonesia, most notably in Java, deliberate
attempts have been made in the past to eradicate wild pigs altogether by
means of organized shooting parties and poisoning campaigns. However, despite
many thousands of wild pigs being destroyed in this way, it is clear that
this has had little lasting effect on these animals which, according to
Hoogerwerf (1970), have: "remained further removed from extinction than
any other species of game in Java". This situation evidently obtains in
a number of other countries, including Vietnam (R. Ratajszsak, pers. comm.)
and Taiwan (K. Newell, pers. comm.), where wild pigs are reported to survive
in a number of nominally protected areas where all or most of the other
principal 'game' species have been eradicated by sustained hunting pressure. In these and many other (non-Islamic) countries or
local communities, wild pigs often constitute the single most important game
animal to subsistence and/or recreational hunters. Sport hunting accounts for
about 30 to 50% of animals heavier than 20 kg in southern France, though this
figure may be as high as 50 to 75% in some heavily populated countries, where
hunting remains largely or wholly uncontrolled (Spitz, 1986). For example,
the wild pig population inhabiting the 25,000 ha of broadleaved woodlands
around Monticiano in Italy, has apparently been able to sustain its numbers
despite an annual hunter-kill rate of about 50% (c. 500 animals) of the
population (Devitt, 1984). According to figures produced by the Japanese
Environment Agency a total of 1,279,453 (or x 63,973 per annum) wild pigs
were harvested in Japan between 1970 and 1989 (incl.), of which 1,083,858
(85%) were taken by hunters, and the remaining 195,596 were destroyed as crop
pests during the closed season. The great majority of these animals are S. s. leucomystax from the main
islands of Honshu, Shikoko and Kyushu, and this subspecies is evidently able
to withstand high levels of harvesting to judge from contemporary reports of
marginal expansions in the overall range of this subspecies (Hanai, 1982;
Takahashi, 1980). Unfortunately, however, these totals do not differentiate
between the numbers of S. s.
leucomystax and those of S. s.
riukiuanus from the three small islands of Amami Oshima, Tokuno Shima and
Kakeroma Jima, which are also included in these figures. As previously
indicated, the latter subspecies is declining rapidly in numbers on these
islands, and on the neighboring island of Okinawa, largely as a result of
over-hunting (Barber et al., 1984;
H. Obara, pers. comm.). This conclusion is also borne out by official figures
on the annual harvest of S. s. riukiuanus from two other islands, Iriomote
and Ishigaki, in the Ryukyu chain between 1965 and 1981, which indicate a
downward trend in the numbers of these animals (Yasuma, 1984) and a marked
increase in the amount of effort required by local hunters to obtain smaller
catches (Hanai, 1982). Nonetheless, according to these figures an average of
530 and 190 wild pigs were still being taken annually on Iriomote and
Ishigaki, respectively; of which slightly more than 50% were killed as
'agricultural pests', i.e. mostly out of season, often with a Government
bounty being paid. Moreover, it is certain that these totals are a serious
underestimate - perhaps by as much as 50-100% - of the actual numbers killed,
since many hunters operate without licenses and do not declare their catches
(Barber et al., 1984; Yasuma, 1984).
Formerly, virtually all of these pigs were consumed locally but, following
the restoration of electricity (and, hence, refrigeration) in 1972,
commercial traders began operating on the islands, and the majority of
carcasses are now exported to gourmet markets in Osaka, where they realize
relatively high prices and ensure a continued demand for wild-caught meat
(Yasuma, 1984). Wild pigs are also susceptible to a variety of
highly contagious diseases which can decimate their populations. Santiapillai
et al. (1991) referred to a catastrophic crash in the wild pig population of
Ruhuna National Park in Sri Lanka in 1989 owing to an outbreak of swine
fever, but that population numbers had apparently recovered by June 1991.
Many wild pigs are also reported to have died during an outbreak of disease
in the Kanto Region on Honshu Island, Japan in 1877 (Yanagida, 1913). It is
possible that this was hog cholera, contracted from domestic pigs which were
imported to the region at that time (Chiba, 1975), and this may have been one
of the factors contributing to the extirpation of S. s. leucomystx throughout
the north of their range on this island (Fig. 10). An outbreak of severe skin
disease (tentatively identified as sarcoptic mange) on Iriomote, which was
first noted in 1976, had spread throughout the Island by 1980, and infected
up to 83% of the S. s. riukiuanus
population according to data based on hunter-killed samples (Yasuma, 1984). The Ryukyu pigs are also threatened by genetic
contamination through contact with free-ranging domesticates. On Ishigaki
Island, interbreeding with domestic pigs has been so prevalent that it is
doubtful if the remaining wild stock can be considered genetically pure
(Obara, 1982). Moreover, it is unlikely that this problem will be confined to
Ishigaki, given that the meat from wild x domestic hybrids or 'ino-buta' is popular and local
farmers will continue to produce it. Indeed, ino-buta have been farmed commercially on Iriomote for many
years, often in poorly controlled conditions. As a result, feral ino-buta have become established on
the adjacent, smaller islands of Sotobanare and Uchibanare, and it is claimed
that a number of these animals have crossed onto Iriomote at low tide;
thereby posing a further, serious threat to the remaining wild stock there
(Yasuma, 1984; Takahashi & Tisdell, in press). Similarly, Genov et
al. (1991) reported that the traditional practice of rearing 'domestic'
pigs in semi-wild conditions in Bulgaria has resulted in their hybridizing
with the wild boar populations in the eastern and north-eastern parts of that
country, and that genetically pure wild boars now occur only in the
Rila-Pirin-Rhodopes Mountains in the south of this country, where domestic
pigs are not reared in the wild. The principal threat to the survival of the
Monticiano population in Italy, lies not so much with the high annual
hunter-kill rate but with the fact that the genetic integrity of the native
population has been seriously compromised by the introduction of Central
European boars after World War II, which have interbred with these animals.
Indeed, the introduction of non-native wild pigs, by hunting interest groups
in the belief that these were more desirable because of their larger size and
reputed greater fecundity, has been so widespread in Italy that the only
surviving pure-bred native stock is thought to be in the presidential reserve
in Castel Porziano, near Rome (Devitt, 1984). Conservation Measures Taken Generally, few, if any, practical measures have been
taken in any country for the specific purpose of conserving wild populations
of any subspecies of S. scrofa,
except in the sense of maintaining stock levels for hunting, particularly for
sport hunting. Thus Genov et al.
(1991) reported a gradual increase of the wild boar population in Bulgaria in
the late 1950's following legal measures to regulate hunting, and because of
the reintroduction of animals from breeding farms in the north-east of the
country, in the Balkan Range and Sredna Gora. Even in this instance, however,
other factors may also be operating, since similar increases in the local
wild pig populations in Spain, France, Switzerland, Czechoslovakia and
eastern Russia have been described by Sáez-Royuela & Tellería (1986), who
simply attributed this trend to a progression to a more temperate climate
and, hence, progressively milder winters of benefit to these animals. Somewhat ironically, local wild pig populations are
also reported to be increasing in numbers in several countries as a
consequence of the spread of Islam. For example, the north-west African race,
S. s. algira, although extinct in
Libya, is thought to be expanding in neighboring Algeria where it is
designated a game animal but, as the meat is now seldom eaten in this
country, hunting pressure has been greatly reduced since colonial times
(Kowalski & Rzebik-Kowalski, 1991). These authors also cite earlier
reports of wild boars hybridizing with domestic pigs, but the latter are no
longer kept in Algeria. As previously stated, S. s. riukiuanus has been included in the IUCN Red List since
1982, where its 'vulnerable' status reflects a widespread concern about the
environmentally destructive development of the Ryukyu Islands and the growing
number of threats to the ecosystems and endemic species of Iriomote and other
islands in this region. In 1978, these concerns led to the passing of a
resolution at the 14th IUCN General Assembly in Ashkhabad, which called upon
the Government of Japan to take immediate steps to ensure the conservation of
Iriomote Island and its endemic taxa, and for the subsequent designation of
the whole of the Nansei Shoto Region (often referred to as the 'Galapagos of
the East' on account of the high percent endemicity of its fauna and flora)
as a bio-geographical priority region in the World Conservation Strategy. In
1982, the 'Nansei Shoto Conservation Project' was launched by WWF-Japan, with
initial emphasis being placed on the conduct of wildlife and socio-economic
surveys on Iriomote and Amami Oshima (Obara, 1984a,b). In the interim,
however, the desired increased protection of the Nansei Shoto Region was
clearly at odds with the Japanese Government's regional policies, and the
development of the islands continued - a circumstance which led to the
passage of a another resolution, condemning Japan's treatment of the region,
at the 16th General Assembly of IUCN in Costa Rica in 1986. Unfortunately,
this also appears to have had little affect, as evinced by further major
development plans, including the controversial Ishigaki Airport extension,
and recent plans to construct a new dam and road on Iriomote Island. Although
one third of Iriomote has been designated as a national park, the proposed
road will cut through the park and will also increase access by poachers who
have already reduced the wild pig to less than half of its numbers before the
park was created (Brazil, 1988). Captive Breeding Of all wild pigs species, S. scrofa is by far the most widely maintained and bred in
captivity, though general perceptions about the relative abundance of this
species has resulted in diminished interest in its propagation. Many zoos,
particularly in western Europe, have therefore disposed of their stocks of
these animals, mostly to 'wild boar breeding farms', which have escalated in
number to meet growing demands in the gourmet meat markets and for commercial
diversification. In addition, increasingly restrictive quarantine and other
veterinary regulations appertaining to the international movements of all
live suids, has made it extremely difficult to establish new breeding
programs. Contrarily, since these animals are most easily
acquired in their countries of origin, local stocks are most likely to be
pure-bred and, hence, most valuable for research and conservation purposes.
In this situation, priority should be given to the establishment of national
or regional breeding programmes for each of the rarest subspecies, especially
S. s. riukiuanus. Unfortunately,
although there were at least 13 (6 males, 7 females) individuals of this
subspecies were in captivity in Japan in 1990, these were located in five
separate collections, and there is still no coordinated plan for its
long-term management on either a national or international scale (JAZGA,
1990). Conservation Measures Proposed: An Action Plan As a general rule, S. scrofa is both highly adaptable and highly resistant to a
variety of degradative processes, and may thrive under conditions of habitat
modification and hunting pressure which have devastated other forms of
wildlife. In addition, most subspecies are well represented in protected
areas in their relatively extensive ranges. Nonetheless, there are reasons
for concern about a number of distinct populations of S. scrofa, of which the
Ryukyu pigs are undoubtedly the most seriously threatened. Indeed, riukiuanus is the only subspecies of S. scrofa to be included in the IUCN
Red List of Threatened Animals (IUCN, 1990), where it has been accorded the
status of 'vulnerable' since 1982, but is already thought to be 'endangered'
on at least four of the six islands in the Ryukyu Chain which constitute its
entire, and therefore extremely restricted, range. This particular form is
also the most distinct, and (with an average adult male body weight of only
about 45 kg; Barber et al., 1984) by
far the smallest, subspecies. It is therefore of some interest as a potential
genetic resource, as well as being one of the principal 'flagship' animals
for increased conservation activity in the crucially important Nansei Shoto
Region. For all of these reasons, the following recommendations are mostly
confined to the immediate and longer-term management requirements of this
taxon. Objectives: 1. To promote
local interest in, and the enhanced future protection and management of, the
Ryukyu Islands' dwarf wild pig, S. s. riukiuanus, and any other threatened
native subspecies may be identified in the future; 2. To promote
further applied research on the taxonomy, distribution, conservation status
and biology of the species, particularly the least known forms; 3. To
discourage any future releases of any specimens of any subspecies of this
species, or its domestic and feral derivatives, outside their known former
ranges, and encourage the eradication or control of such introduced
populations as may exist at present; and 4. To
investigate the cultural and economic significance of these animals to local
people, particularly in S. E. Asia, and their potential genetic importance in
terms of: a) possibilities for their further domestication and/or b) an enhanced
understanding of the origins and relationships of present day domestic and
wild populations. Priority Projects: 1. Provide all
appropriate support to any existing or proposed future conservation
initiatives in the Nansei Shoto Region, relevant to the enhanced future
management and protection of the Ryukyu Island's dwarf wild pig, S. s. riukiuanus. Given the often highly politicized
nature of conservation issues in this Region, and widespread governmental and
local ambivalence, disinterest or even hostility towards the conservation
needs of these animals, actions primarily directed towards their enhanced
future protection are unlikely to engender local support over much of their
remaining range (but also see below) and could well prove counter-productive.
For these and other reasons, priority should be given to supporting
programmes directed towards the conservation of biodiversity, which is, in
any event, of obvious overriding importance. 2. Conduct
(preliminary or repeat) status surveys on all (six) islands in the Ryukyu
Group known to support remnant populations of S. s. riukiuanus (i.e. Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima,
Amamioshima and Kakerome), and implement emergent recommendations. Recent data is lacking on the
distribution, status and future management needs of these animals on each of
these islands, but particularly Kakerome (a U.S. Naval Base) and Tokunoshima
which are not known to have been surveyed in this context. Any such surveys
should also try to assess current local attitudes to these animals, current
population trends, the extent of domestic consumption versus commercial trade
in the flesh of these animals and the hybrid 'inobuta', the level of
hybridization/genetic purity of each population (i.e. from interviews and the
collection of blood and other tissue samples from hunter-killed specimens for
comparative molecular genetic studies of populations on each of these
islands, the status of existing protected areas (if any) and options for the
enhanced future protection of representative populations on each island, etc.
A special effort should also be made to alert the U.S. Navy to the biological
importance of the forested lands under their jurisdiction on Okinawa and
Kakerome, and to enlist the support of that authority in the implementation
of recommendations for the future protection and benign management of these
habitats and species. 3. Promote
development of a coordinated breeding programmed for S. s. riukiuanus, both nationally and internationally. Despite international recognition
of their precarious status, there has been a perplexing and regrettable lack
of interest within the Japanese zoo community to develop any coordinated
breeding program for these animals. In fact, a reasonable number of potential
founders already exist in a few collections in the country, some of which are
breeding these animals, but further, concerted efforts should be made to
encourage those collections to collaborate in the development of such a
program and to extend this program to other reputable collections elsewhere -
preferably under the aegis of a structured 'conservation education and
research program' in the best interests of these animals and the issues they
represent. 4. Collect,
evaluate and disseminate data on the taxonomic relationships, distribution
and conservation status of other, less-known forms, with a view to the
resolution of certain outstanding taxonomic problems and the development of
recommendations for their enhanced future protection, if so required. Additional data is needed on the
distribution and status of some, poorly-known subspecies and populations,
including a tentatively assigned form (subsp. nov.) from the central highlands of Sri Lanka and the insular taivanus (Taiwan). Efforts should also
be made to resolve outstanding questions relating to the genetic distinctness
and range limitations of many of the continental races, which are poorly
understood at present. 5. Promote
further research on the biology and ecology of all less-studied populations,
particularly those in extreme habitats, or in areas of sympatry with other
species of Sus. Most of the information on this
species has originated from studies conducted in Europe or on the feral
populations in the U.S.A., Australia and New Zealand. Priority should
therefore be given to studies of other populations elsewhere, particularly
those in semi-desert regions or other extreme habitats, and/or studies
focused on the ecological and genetic relationships between this and other
species of Sus in those areas where
sympatry occurs (e.g. with S. barbatus
in the Malaysian Peninsular and Sumatra, and with S. verrucosus on Java). Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to John A. Burton, Peter
Grubb, John J. Mayer, Francois Spitz and Alastair Macdonald for their helpful
input and suggestions on various drafts of this paper, and to Paul Vercammen
and Peter Cuypers for their patience and assistance in preparing and updating
the distribution map. I.L.B's contribution to the preparation of this Plan
was supported in part by a contract (DE-AC09-76SR00-819) between the United
States Department of Energy and the University of Georgia. References Barber, G.,
Horne, L., Mason, M. and Perkins, P. 1984. Nansei Shoto Expedition, Japan:
December 7th 1983 - January 10th 1984. (Unpubl.) report: 52 pp. Beuerle, W.
1975. Frielanduntersuchungen zum kampf-und sexualverhalten des Europ„ischen
wildschweines (Sus scrofa L.).
Zeitschrift Tierpsychologie 39: 211-258. Bosma, A., De
Haan, N. A. and Macdonald, A. A. 1984. Karyoptype variability in the wild
boar (Sus scrofa). Symposium
International sur le Sanglier, Toulouse 1984. Colloque de l'INRA No 22:
53-56. Brazil, M.
1988. Japan's string of pearls loses its lustre. New Scientist 117 (1,606):
47-51. Briedermann, L.
1990. Schwarzwild. VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag, Berlin: 540 pp. Chiba, T. 1964.
Geographical distribution of wild boars and deer in the Japanese Islands and
their areal and quantitative fluctuations (in Japanese). Geographical Rev. 37
(11): 575-592. Chiba, T. 1975.
Distributions of large wild mammals and their changes in the eastern foot of
Mt. Zao, Miyagi Prefecture, northern Honshu (in Japanese). Annals. Tohoko
Geog. Assoc. (Tohoko Chiri), 27 (2): 74-81. Devitt, J.
1984. All-Italian boars. BBC Wildl. Mag., December 1984: p. 604. Diong, C. H.
1973. Studies of the Malayan wild pig in Parak and Johore. Malay. Nat. J. 26:
120-151. Genov, P.,
Nikolov, H., Massei, G. and Gerasimov, S. 1991. Craniometrical analysis of
Bulgarian wild boar (Sus scrofa)
populations. J. Zool. Soc. Lond. 225: 309-325. Groves, C. P.
1981). Ancestors for the Pigs - Taxonomy and Phylogeny of the Genus Sus, Tech. Bull. No. 3., Dept. of
Prehistory, Australian National Univ. Press, Canberra: 96 pp. Groves, C. P.
and Grubb, P. (this vol.). The Eurasian wild pigs, Sus and Babyrousa:
taxonomy and description. Hanai, M. 1982.
Fluctuations in numbers of Ryukyu inoshishi (wild pigs). (Unpubl.) ms.: 13
pp. Harrison, D. L.
and Bates, P. J. J. 1991. The Mammals of Arabia (2nd Ed.). Harrison
Zoological Museum, Sevenoaks, United Kingdom, xvi+ 354 pp. Harting, J. E.
1880. British Animals, Extinct within Historic Times. Trbner & Co.,
London: pp. 77-114. Hassinger, J.
D. 1970. A survey of the mammals of Afganistan. Fieldiana Zool. 60: p. 163. Heptner, V. G.,
Nasimovich, A. A. and Bannikov, A. G. 1961. Artiodactyla and Perissodactyla.
Vol. 1, 1147 pp., in: V. G. Heptner and N. P. Naumov (eds.): Mammals of the
Soviet Union, Vysshaya Shkola Publishers, Moscow (English translation, 1988,
Smithsonian Institution Libraries and The National Science Foundation,
Washington D. C.). Hoogerwerf, A.
1970): Udjong Kulon. The Land of the Last Javan Rhinoceros. E. J. Brill,
Leiden, Netherlands. Hufnagl, E. (1972): Libyan Mammals. Orleander Press: p.
48. I.U.C.N. 1990.
IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Cambridge and Gland: p. 26. JAZGA 1990.
Japanese Association of Zoological Gardens and Aquariums (JAZGA). Ann. Rep.
1989. Jezierski, W.
1977. Longevity and mortality rate in a population of wild boar. Acta
Theriologica 22/24: 337-348. Kowalski, K.
and Rzebik-Kowalski, B. 1991. Mammals of Algeria. Polish Academy of Sciences,
Warsaw: 186-189. Lay, D. M.
1967. A study of the mammals of Iran. Fieldiana Zool. 54: 1-282. p. 223. Lekagul, B. and
McNeely, J. A. 1977. Mammals of Thailand. Kurusapha Ladprao Press, Bangkok:
pp. 661-664. Obara, H.
1982): The present status of the Iriomote dwarf hog. (Unpubl.) ms.: 2 pp. Obara, H.
1984a. Nansei Shoto Conservation Project by WWFJ. In: Conservation of the Nansei
Shoto: Part I, WWF Japan Scientific Committee. World Wildlife Fund Japan: pp.
1-2. Obara, H. 1984b
Conservation issues in Japan. IUCN: Species Survival Commission Newsletter 3:
9-10. Oliver, W. L.
R. and Brisbin, I. L. (this vol.) Intoduced and feral pigs: problems, policy
and priorities. Pauwels, W.
1980. Study of Sus scrofa vittatus,
its ecology and behaviour in Ujung Kulon Nature Reserve, Java, Indonesia.
(Unpubl.) Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Basel, Switzerland. Prater, S. H.
1971): The Book of Indian Animals. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., Bombay: 299-300. Rose, C. J. and
Williams, W. T. 1983. Ingestion of earthworms, Pontoscolex corethrurus, by village pigs, Sus scrofa papuensis,
in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. Applied Animal Ethology 11: 131-139. Sáez-Royuela,
C. and Tellería, J. L. 1986. The increased population of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe. Mammal Rev.
16 (2): 97-101. Santapillai, C.
and Chambers, M. R. 1980. Aspects of the population dynamics of the wild pig
(Sus scrofa, Linnaeus 1758) in the
Ruhana National Park, Sri Lanka. Spixiana 3 (3): 239-250. Santiapillai,
C., Dissanayake, S., Sumanasena, A. H., Padmasiri, U. Wijesinghe, G.,
Jaymane, H. P. and Badaranaike, C. 1991. Population structure, activity and
density of the wild pig (Sus scrofa)
in the Ruhuna National Park, Sri Lanka. W.W.F.- 3988 Project Report Asia:
conservation of large mammals, August 1991 (unpubl.): 9 pp. Shafi, M. M.
and Khokhar, A. R. 1985. Some observations on wild boar (Sus scrofa) and its control in sugarcane areas of Pujab,
Pakistan. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 83: 63-67. Spitz, F. 1986.
Current state of knowledge of wild boar biology. Pig News & Information 7
(2): 171-175. Spitz, F. and
Janeau, G. 1990. Spatial strategies: an attempt to classify daily movements
in wild boars. Acta Ther. 35: 129-149. Takahashi, S.
1980): Recent changes in the distribution of wild boars and the trade of
their flesh in Japan. Geog. Sciences (Chiri-Kagaku), 34: 24-31. Takahashi, S.
and Tisdell, C. (in press) The feral and near feral animals of Iriomote
Island: pigs, goats and cattle. Geog. Rev. Japan (Series B), 65 (1). Yanagida, K.
1913. Changes in distribution of wild animals (in Japanese). The Collected
Writings of Yanagida Kunio, 24: p. 416. Yasuma, S. 1984. The Iriomote wild pig in danger of
extinction (August 1982 Survey). In: Conservation of the Nansei Shoto: Part
I, WWF Japan Scientific Committee. World Wildlife Fund Japan: 177-185. |
|
Next: Chapter 5.3 – The
Pygmy Hog |