|
2.2 The local environment - natural resources, protected areas and carrying capacity for human populations
This section briefly illustrates the management status of some natural resources of great
importance for human populations. Ideally, sound management incorporates both
preservation and sustainable use, i.e., the maintenance of viable ecosystems capable of
sustaining biodiversity and providing resources for future generations, coupled with
uses of such resources to satisfy today's needs (IUCN et al.,1991).
Water
The current world supply of renewable fresh water per capita is only 60 percent of what
it was in 1970 (Engelman and LeRoy, 1993). Water is becoming scarce due to growing
populations, increasing demands for agricultural and industrial use and inefficient water
management. At the local level, specific causes may include man-made changes in
watersheds (e.g., dams, irrigation systems), changes in vegetation coverage
(deforestation, erosion), increased pumping of underground water (lowering the water
table), and waste in water distribution systems (including losses due to leakage).
Decreased availability of water is coupled to worsening of water quality. Excessive
exploitation of surface and underground water for irrigation purposes may lead to
salinization (i.e., abnormal concentration of mineral salts in the topsoil) and water
logging due to poor drainage. Increased use of surface water by human and livestock
populations increases the risk of biological contamination of streams, ponds and lakes
(with consequences for human health). Uncontrolled industrial and agricultural use may
cause chemical pollution of both underground and surface water (with potentially severe
consequences on human health, fisheries and aquatic animals and plants).
A set of indicators for assessing water availability, water quality, and functioning of
water supplies and distribution systems at the local level is provided in Table 2.4. This
information could be useful in working with communities that are making decisions
about the importance of water management initiatives, as well as in evaluating the
relevant results.
Table 2.4: Some indicators of water availability, water quality, and functioning of water supplies
and distribution systems at the local level
|
Topic | Indicators |
| Water availability |
percentage of households with safe domestic water sources (wells, taps, etc.);
average walking time from house to source of safe drinkable water;
average number of liters per capita available in the household in different
seasons;
hourly capacity of springs in different seasons;
depth of the water table as measured in different seasons in a sample of wells;
regularity of stream flow (overflow after rainfall? dry in summer? etc.);
average time spent daily for watering cattle in different seasons;
percentage of productive units having access to irrigation
systems;
surface of irrigated land plots;
length of irrigation systems. |
| Water quality (human use only) |
turbidity, chemical pollution, bacterial pollution;
number of fecal coliforms per ml in different water sources and seasons;
salt concentration per ml in different water sources and seasons;
frequency and appropriateness of chlorinization of wells, tanks, and piped-water
systems;
percentage of households satisfied with the taste and appearance of water in
different seasons. |
| Functioning of water supply systems |
number of days per year in which household wells or taps are not functioning;
percentage of households relying on domestic water harvesting systems;
presence and function of local water committee controlling maintenance and
support for water supply;
number and availability of local mechanics with training to repair wells or taps;
liters lost per minute due to major leakages in the supply system;
seasonal differences in depth of water table.
|
Community-based initiatives for improving local water management may include:
- protection of water sources (e.g., building a cement cover and outflow pipes for
a spring so that animals and people do not contaminate the source);
- construction of rain-water harvesting systems (e.g., a system of pipes or channels
to capture water from the roof of a house and store it in a cistern);
- improvement and maintenance of water distribution systems (e.g., providing
ideas about the technology of a water system, labor for its construction, and arranging
for the training of local mechanics to maintain the system):
- monitoring of the quality of water for human consumption;
- building appropriate human sanitation facilities (e.g., latrines, toilets);
- afforestation, building bunds, and contour plowing for increased soil moisture
and groundwater recharge.
Another important natural resource linked with water is wetlands, e.g., swamps, sloughs
and shorelines. Many useful items are extracted from wetlands, e.g., food (fruits, meat,
fish), building materials (trees, reeds), water (for irrigation, drinking, washing),
traditional medicines, etc. In addition, wetlands are important locations for cultivation
and dry-season grazing. For instance, the moist dambo lands along the upper valleys of
streams in Malawi are able to produce two crops per year compared to the single
growing season on the surrounding eroded and semi-arid hillsides. Wetlands, and the
plants and animals which are adapted to such regions, are under tremendous pressure
from expanding populations. Drainage for agriculture is estimated to have resulted in
the loss of 26 percent of wetlands worldwide (OECD/IUCN, 1996).
Soil
Between 1945 and 1990, over one-tenth of the world's vegetated land (approximately
1.2 billion hectares) has suffered at least moderate soil degradation as a result of human
activity. Cultivation has reduced the world's pre-agricultural supply of organic carbon by about 15 percent: about 60 billion
tons of soil carbon have risen from the soil to the atmosphere as climate-warming
carbon dioxide (Engelman and LeRoy, 1995). In recent times, the most widespread soil
degradation has occurred in Asia (450 million hectares) and Africa (320 million
hectares), mostly because of extending agricultural frontiers, overgrazing and
deforestation.
At the local level, processes of soil degradation may include:
- decrease in depth of the humus stratum (the unconsolidated mineral and organic
material on the immediate surface of the earth, which serves as a natural medium for the
growth of plants);
- decrease of soil fertility and productivity (fewer varieties of plants will grow and
their yields are lower);
- increase of the surface exposed to erosion phenomena (i.e., total wash-out of the
humus stratum); and
- desertification (the extension or development of barren lands in areas previously
covered by vegetation).
Indicators for assessing soil degradation at the local level and for evaluating the
implementation of important remedial actions are presented in Table 2.5.
Table 2.5: Some indicators of soil loss and soil conservation initiatives at the local level
|
Topic | Indicators |
| Soil loss |
arable/barren land ratio;
percentage of land affected by major erosion (gullies, land-slides, etc.);
percentage of land abandoned in a given period of time due to low yields;
reported changes in cropping patterns due to changes in soil fertility;
extent of soil sediments in local streams;
frequency of occurrence of problematic soil (e.g., strong acidity, salinity).
| Soil conservation initiatives |
percentage of arable land with soil conservation measures implemented (terraces, wind-breaking hedges, etc.);
length of terraces, wind-breaking hedges, etc.;
surface area under biological and/or physical control of erosion;
percentage of productive units implementing soil conservation measures;
percentage of productive units using good manuring and cultivation practices;
percentage of fallow land recovered for agricultural purposes;
percentage of cattle reared in stables.
|
Soil conservation and recovery action is usually undertaken in the framework of extensive public-works programs. Actually, conservation measures
usually require a surplus of land or labor, which cannot generally be afforded by small-farmer household economies. Even so, if sound income-generating incentives are
provided, relevant initiatives can be implemented at the local level with limited
investments. Community-based initiatives for soil conservation and recovery may
include:
- building slow formation terraces on slopes;
- gully and land-slide control (e.g., by contour farming, small-scale afforestation,
planting soil-binding grasses in high-risk areas, etc.);
- improvement of cultivation practices (e.g., planting wind-breaking hedges,
introducing nitrogen-fixing crops);
- promotion of biological and/or proper chemical manuring;
- introduction of crop-rotation;
- improvement of irrigation and drainage systems;
- introduction of stable livestock-rearing technologies.
Before introducing new soil conservation technologies, it may be crucial to determine
whether the local culture is familiar with techniques and means to control erosion and
maintain fertility of the soil. Reviving and strengthening peasant know-how in this area
is often the best way of dealing with problems related to soil management at the local
level.
|
Case Example 2.8: Soil conservation in a dry climate
Since independence, the Tanzanian government has established a number of integrated
land conservation programs in the semi-arid interior of the country, where dry savannah
prevails and people depend on pastoral and agro-pastoral economies. In most of these
areas, land degradation is a common consequence of excessive grazing and insufficient
soil and water conservation measures (all of which arose from the clearing of woodlands
done in the first half of this century for tsetse fly eradication).
In the 1970s and early 1980s such conservation measures ranged from machine-intensive works to labor-intensive construction, from check-dams and woodlots to the
relocation of people and outright enclosure of severely degraded areas. Some ecological
results were impressive, but local people rarely offered their genuine participation in
these measures. At times, they even defied government regulations openly, for instance,
by keeping their herds where grazing was illegal, and organizing among themselves to
pay the fines collectively.
More recent soil conservation programs have learned from these experiences. First,
local villagers are now involved in negotiations from the beginning, resulting in
enclosures that are generally smaller and do not involve resettlement of many
households or villages. Second, negotiations take into account a variety of aspects of
resource conservation and use, and thus proceed for a longer time but end up in more
complex and sophisticated regulations. Third, the Tanzanian Forest and Bee-keeping
Division is now taking full advantage of existing local associations and traditional
management practices.
For instance, among the Sukuma people in the region of Shinyanga, there exist
traditional grazing reserves (called ngitire), where herds are allowed to graze only
during the dry season. Most of these reserves are established on communal land, in
hilltops or river valleys, and under the strict control of village leaders. The Forest and
Bee-keeping Division negotiates now with local leaders and associations for the
extension of these traditional reserves, as well as for de-stocking practices, woodlot
management and controlling the use of other resources. Local organizations like the
Sungusungu (originally groups of young warriors who protected the herds against theft)
are fully enlisted in resource management tasks and capacities, and special funds are
created in each village to help them carry out various activities.
|
|
Case Example 2.9: Surviving the winds of change - Karen people live in harmony with World Heritage
One of the few remaining refuges where the forest-dwelling Karen people have been
able to maintain their traditional lifestyle is inside the Thung Yai Naresuan Wildlife
Sanctuary in Thailand. Within the sanctuary, there are six villages which are home to a
population of 1,100 Karen people. Government officials from the Royal Forest
Department, some conservationists and some academics have been in favor of the
removal of the villages in order to preserve the forest ecosystem. The relationship
between the Karen people and most outsiders has been marked by mutual mistrust and
misunderstanding. The debate over the resettlement of the Karen from Thung Yai
intensified when Thung Yai was declared a World Heritage Site.
The threat to the Karen's continued survival in Thung Yai has been championed by a
loose coalition of grassroots and conservation groups. This coalition advocated the
Karen's rights to remain in the Sanctuary, which they have occupied for centuries.
Meanwhile, various efforts have been undertaken to document and better understand the
impact of the Karen's cultural and subsistence practices on their environment, as well as
to provide environmental education and basic extension services in Karen villages.
Anthropologists and agricultural researchers found out that the Karen people have an
agricultural management system defined by rules ensuring that their cultivation
practices do not deplete the soil. For example, a Karen family never plants more than
three plots of land and they select their rice and vegetable plots only after bamboo
shoots emerge in order to avoid disrupting the natural forest cycles. The Karen also
employ a system of multi-cropping rice with various other crops to balance the nutrients
in the soil, plant several rice varieties to protect the crops from pests and diseases, and
apply natural fertilizers.
This documentation of the Karen's environmentally sound agriculture counteracted the
Thai government officials' perception that the Karen belong to the category of
destructive slash-and-burn agriculturists. Partly as a result of advocates' efforts in
documenting the cultural and agricultural practices of the Karen, the Karen people have
been allowed to remain in Thung Yai. Uncertainty is still high, however, as to the
Karen's permanent status in the Sanctuary, as land and forest policies tend to change
with successive governments.
From: Hulse and Thongmak, 1996
|
Forests
Before the agricultural revolution, forests were the most prevalent biome on Earth
(approximately one-third of the total). Currently, only 9.4 percent of the planet's surface
is covered by forests. Over the centuries, due to the growing demands for large-scale
timber production and agricultural land, forests have been replaced by secondary
woodlands, savannah, pasture areas and cultivation. Timbering for local uses and fuel
wood has also contributed to deforestation, especially around settlements.
Today, deforestation continues, despite widespread awareness of the many
environmental benefits provided by forests, such as:
- protection of watershed and regulation of water flow;
- prevention of soil-erosion;
- contribution to the balance of the carbon cycle; and
- giving back moisture to the atmosphere.
Forests also provide important economic benefits to local communities, such as game,
wild fruits, mushrooms, timber, fuel wood and other vegetal products (e.g., latex, dyes,
waxes, medicinal plants, etc.), (see Box 2.7 below). Sustainable exploitation of the forests is a
basic component of local subsistence strategies, especially in the tropics, where a
significant proportion of dietary proteins and micro-nutrients is obtained through
hunting, fishing and gathering. In addition, forests supply well over 90 percent of the
total energy used for domestic purposes in poorer nations.
|
Box 2.7: Variable use of forest resources in three villages in Sri Lanka
Three villages in close proximity to each other in the Tihagoda district of Sri Lanka's
southern tropical rain forest area illustrate the potential for wide variations in the use of
a similar set of local resources.
The Batuwita Village has long supported itself through the production of household
items made of bamboo and rattan. The average household receives an income of Rs.
32,000 per year (US$650 in 1993) from the sale of these products. Since the rattan and
bamboo supplies in the immediate vicinity of this village have been exhausted, villagers
now must travel 45km (by bicycle) to obtain these resources.
In the Akkarapanaha Village, rattan and bamboo are collected in small quantities from
nearby areas, primarily for the village's own use. A more significant source of income is
the sale of meat that has been hunted from the forests.
In the Narangala Village, the public forest is mainly used to collect fuel wood. Villagers
collect substantially (50 percent) more fuel wood than other villages in the Tihagoda
District. This community reports virtually no income from forest products, but is the
only village of the three that uses forest areas for grazing.
|
Large-scale reforestation and afforestation are strategies at the national level for
improving forests. Frequently, however, these plans clash with the short-term interests
and immediate needs of local communities. An important alternative is the community
forestry approach (Lee Peluso et al., 1994). In this community-based strategy, local
people are actively involved in planning and managing activities that, on the one hand,
protect the forest as a whole and, on the other, assure them access to fuel, food and other
forest items necessary for livelihood and income-generating activities (a fairly typical
example of primary environmental care).
|
Case Example 2.10: Involving the stakeholders - Joint Forest Management in West Bengal, India
West Bengal, which has historically suffered from virtually uncontrollable resource
degradation and species loss, is where Joint Forest Management (JFM) has been most
successfully implemented (in 75 percent of the forests/woodlands). With the program,
the relationship between villages and forest department officials greatly improved.
Whereas in the past the forest officers were primarily involved in policing activities,
they are now acting more as mediators/public relations officers between community
Forest Protection Committees and the upper echelons of the Forest Department.
The Sal Forest is clearly regenerating under the JFM agreements. Villagers can access
and use Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) for household needs and as income
generators (e.g., sal leaves, gums, edible insects, resins, medicinal plants). Interestingly,
this system has succeeded despite a significant increase in human population which took
place at the same time and in the same districts where forest regeneration occurred.
When the 10-year regrowth cycle is completed, villagers fear (and officials anticipate)
that there will be a glut in the market as an excessive number of sal poles will be ready
for harvesting. Some Forest Protection Committee members would like the sal trees to
be left standing and harvested during more economically favorable circumstances. Other
villagers and tribal healers are also encouraging further ecological succession and
species diversification within the Sal Forest rather than timber harvest after the 10-year
cycle.
Whilst the West Bengal experience in JFM is clearly inspiring, the attitudes and
behavior of some forest officers remain problematic. Informal comments by foresters at
different levels within the Forest Department hierarchy often describe village tribal people and their FPC as
'ignorant', 'primitive', 'underdeveloped in all aspects' and 'economically irrational'.
Similarly, the Forest Department's rigid and state-wide regulations (e.g., on choice of
tree species, silvicultural practices and timber harvest time) are at odds with what is
required for local-level adaptive planning, which takes into account the diversity of
ecological, social and economic situations in forest management.
The crucial issue which needs to be resolved in the near future basically hinges on how
to move from Forest Protection to full Participatory Joint Forest Management.
Devolving more responsibility for key silvicultural and income-generation decisions to
village institutions may be essential to achieve the twin goals of conservation and local
livelihood security.
From: Pimbert, 1994
|
Forestry management can be an opportunity for community development. Since a forest
is better protected as a whole than in isolated patches, forestry activities offer the
rationale for organizing (e.g., in a local users' association) to distribute the benefits that
come from the forest (e.g., fodder or water) in an equitable way.
|
Case Example 2.11: Ethnic groups and firewood consumption
The customs of different ethnic groups can greatly influence the use of natural
resources. For example, in Nepal, some ethnic groups consume firewood at higher rates
than others. Tradi-
tionally, Brahmin and Chettri ethnic groups never drink alcohol and do not brew liquor
in their homes. In contrast, ethnic groups such as Tamang, Gurung, Kirati, and Sherpa
in the highlands, and Tharu and Rajbansi on the tropical plains practice home brewing.
Interviews with alcohol-brewing and non-brewing ethnic groups in one village found
that brewing households consume 20 percent more fuel wood than the others.
Contributed by Krishna Oli
|
The objective of community forestry is to promote sustainable use of forest areas by the
local population. Conservation of the forest base thus represents a means of:
- ensuring availability of fuel, building materials, and other goods (e.g., forest
foods, traditional medicines, etc.);
- providing the environmental stability necessary for food production (e.g.,
maintaining the water table, preventing erosion, etc.); and
- generating income and employment.
To achieve the above objectives, agro-forestry technologies have been developed, often
on the basis of local knowledge. These include:
- semi-cultivation of timber and other valuable species;
- management of animal and vegetal species important to the local diet;
- improvement in the efficiency of cooking-stoves;
- selective cutting of trees for timber and fuel wood;
- pest and fire control; and
- development of ecological tourism.
Indicators for assessing the forest situation at the local level and the results of
community-based agro-forestry activities are presented in Table 2.6.
Table 2.6: Some indicators of forest conservation at local level and community-based agro-forestry
activities
|
Topic | Indicators |
| Forest conservation |
percentage of territory covered by primary and secondary forests at different
points in time (e.g., current, one generation ago, etc.);
annual deforestation rate (hectares cleared per 100 hectares of arable land in one
year);
percentage of forest effectively protected by the state, local communities or both;
frequency of small and large fires;
biodiversity of different forest ecotypes (e.g., number and status of different
vegetal and animal species, presence of endangered species);
existence of business interests involved in or aiming at timber exploitation in the
area;
existence of communities solely dependent on the forest for food, firewood,
income, etc. |
| Agro-forestry activities |
surface area of new plantations, enrichment planting and natural regeneration;
number of species planted;
survival rate by species;
percentage of households involved in agro-forestry activities;
percentage of average household income generated from agro-forestry activities;
diversity of forest products being used, appropriateness of harvesting methods and amount of product harvested.
|
| |