World Conservation Bookstore
 You are here: Publishing Guidelines > Closing a Project
Bookstore
IUCN Books Online
World Conservation
IUCN Library
Publishing Info
Media Centre
Site Map
Home page
Publishing Guidelines
I
IUCN and Publishing
II
Planning a Publication
III
Preparing a Publication
IV
Other Publishing Information
V
Using Publications to Communicate the Message
VI
Closing a Project

Publishing Guidelines
VI. Closing a Project

1. An important part of any project is the evaluation phase. This is no less true of a publishing project. An evaluation allows you to gauge how successful your project has been in achieving its purpose, reaching its intended users, and helping IUCN to achieve its Mission.

2. In order to carry out an evaluation you first need to determine the evaluation issues and questions of interest to you. These might include all or some of the following:

  • Influence and impact of the publication – in changing attitudes, behaviours and practices, or legal and administrative policies and frameworks
  • Effectiveness: how effective is the publication in achieving its purpose (such as influencing policy and decision making, promoting best practice, publishing new scientific evidence, etc), to what extent does/has the publication reached its intended audiences?
  • Relevance: how relevant is the publication to the needs of the target audience, and IUCN’s Programme and policy priorities?

3. Other indicators that can be used as part of the evaluation include:

  • Quality of the publication in relation to the relevant professional field of practice
  • Efficiency in generating, producing and disseminating the publication
  • Management of the publishing project (if major in scope and effort)

4. The clearer your purpose, messages and intended target audiences, the easier it will be to evaluate your publishing project.

5. The design of your evaluation and the data collection tools that you use should be appropriate to the budget and significance of the publishing project.

  • Publishing projects with large budgets and those of major significance to IUCN should consider (in addition to user survey forms) carrying out interviews with targeted users to assess the influence and impact of the publications in relation to the costs of producing the publication.
  • Snow ball interviewing, a technique whereby a wider set of respondents to a survey is selected thanks to referrals from the initial respondents and continue until no new respondents are identified, is another way to reach more people who have used the publication.
  • Publishing projects that are modest in budget and scope should use basic cost effective evaluation tools such as user surveys that are distributed with the publication or sent to intended audiences shortly after distribution or purchase. Since return rates are usually low, follow-up with users is recommended to increase the rate of return of survey forms and thus increase the reliability of your data. You should aim for a 20% return rate or more if possible.
  • Focus groups or group interviews are also a good way of exploring evaluation questions with target audiences at major events. It should be noted that both focus groups and group interviews require skilled facilitators.
  • Web surveys can also be used. Note, however, that they do not necessarily reach the full range of audiences and the results will be biased towards those audiences with greater access to the Internet.
  • Web download statistics are a valuable indicator of interest when properly filtered. They are, however, of less value when answering most evaluation questions or exploring reasons why a publication is popular or not.

6. For examples of questions and issues to be considered in evaluating the influence of publications, as well as mapping techniques see the recent Knowledge Products and Services Study on the IUCN Evaluation Website www.iucn.org/themes/eval/database/region/global/2004/knowledge-products-and-services-study.pdf

7. You should develop a common core set of evaluation questions and tools to use on a regular basis so that you can track changes in effectiveness over time. This is called benchmarking your publications practice. You can do this for your individual programme, while Publications Services will benchmark publications practice across the organization. You can then compare your effectiveness with other programmes and with IUCN as a whole.

<<< BACK             INDEX >>>

Publications Services Unit, 219c Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, United Kingdom
• Tel: +44 1223 277894 • Fax: +44 1223 277175 • Email: books@iucn.org
webmaster@iucn.orgCopyright © 1995-2006 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. All rights reserved.